vul3jp6
02 January 2006
  樂生人權&生態
去年中第一次在破報上看到有關樂生的事件,開始好奇這印象中上世紀的痲瘋病怎麼還存在台北這無線網路城市? 在一顆大樹下的音樂會? 與台灣人權的關係? 又過了半年,瑞士友人告訴我; human right is a western word. You east has no human rights。當下有被汙辱的感覺,嘴硬的回答 – human right is English word, of course。樂生處於新莊與迴龍邊緣的一片山坡林地,多數建築始於1930 年日本時期至 1940 年左右光復初期,中式建築風格文雅, 上個月文建會通過暫定古蹟以保6個月,有待台北縣與桃園縣另組古蹟調查隊確定,捷運局與媒體咬住新莊線轉運機房無法動工延宕18個月總工程期,怠忽變通方案的研究與第一步生態考量。再次突顯台灣重大工程的短視。(想想雪山隧道切斷水源的例子) OUCH!



鏟山拔樹容易,保留土地結構與綠地很難? 在自然森林中,大樹自將老去而倒下,新的樹苗便依附老樹而生。早期從台灣各地移至樂生強行隔離,過了大半輩子的院民將會凋零,樂生是他們的家,他們將為後代蘊育的不止是台灣人權的確立,也是一片13 公頃的自然好山水。



q.13公頃有多大?
1坪=0.3025平方公尺
1000平方公尺=1公畝
1000公畝=1公頃

臺灣總面積 = 360萬公頃




 
Comments:
妳說 能怎麼辦?
作一個漂浮在網路上的樂生嗎?
我們沒有human right是對的
因為我們從不保護別人的發言權
但卻從不停止捍衛自己的發言權
這個human right必須是一個由自身開始 向外馳張
然後站在外部 看待自己是如何在這個世界存在著
這時才能說 嗯 我們應該來彈彈human right

我不在乎誰又在水溝裡到下液態汞
或排放幾噸的氯化鎂
我已是生化人
在這個無處不含毒的生態當中
勉強活著
我體內的細胞隨時透過那極薄的膜交換體液
千古以來交到它粒線體上的紀錄
逐漸將要失去適應與判斷的能力

然後我知道它們會有一天為了保護我
開始無限制的長大

如何?
我就是樂生的病人阿?
你不是?

那為什麼問這個?

baza
 
人們記錄著進化

介由基因傳到下一代的速度

比我們能想像的快 如視網膜影像倒立再解讀的

這是現代人與100年電影發明前的不同

所有喜怒哀樂如特效藥般 2個小時快速溶解

樂生人所經歷過的身心痛苦 不是我們 " '正常人" 能想像的

想像一下全身末端神經的錐骨抽痛?

1930-1970 年間 " 每天" 伴眠的是病友的死亡與哀痛

DDS 特效藥治癒好他們 生命力較堅強的一群

因長期隔離政策 以無法回到污煙障氣的大社會 或任何關愛的親友身旁

再次接收別人的指指點點

我當然不是樂生人

形而上的同感也不可能是

人權 & 生態必需是一種共識的感染

很可惜的 也是必然
 
Newspaper Article – related to Lo-Sheng

China Times 2005.12.16

1. Han-Sheng People cut off MRT’s path? Reported by Chen, Cun-Xiong

Xing-Zhuang MRT effect millions of people’s right, the original causes of construction delay is not only because of Lo-Sheng’s building would be regard as historical site, and [Han-Sheng Policy of Taiwan] is also the main point. If later this policy pass by The legislative Yan of R.O.C, 58 Han-Sheng patients’s right would be more important then millions of people’s wishs.

The draft of [Han-Sheng Policy of Taiwan] is divided to 5 sections and 25 policies. Covered Sections are theme, compensation, recovering the honor, residence, and medical care. One crucial point of policy 18, which made by Huang, Chao- Shun (KMT) stated the right of Han-Sheng Group. But Wu, Bin-Shu argued that, eventually if there is only one Han-Sheng patient lived in Lo-Sheng, government can not expel the patient to leave, no matter if Lo-Sheng regard as historical site or not. Some governmenters also consider this policy is out of balance, and suggested to abolish this policy 18.


2. Lo-Sheng Youth Union: Construction Delay Not A Full Responsibility of Lo-Sheng. Reported by Chen, Cun-Xiong.

Four points made by Lo-Sheng Youth Union said,

? Before the transitional station build, MRT could use technical re-plan for functional opening the MRT transport at Xing-Zhuang. Xing-Zhuang’s traffic dark age has no concerns with Lo-Sheng. Construction Delay should not blame to Lo-Sheng.
? There has no direction connection between Xing-Zhuang’s transitional station and functional opening of Xing-Zhuang MRT. If Xing-Zhuang’s transitional station is yet finish, MRT could still use Lo-Zhung’s transitional station for transitional and repairing purposes. Xing-Zhuang MRT line could still carry on the opening of transport.
? If construction itself has no delay, the construction along Xing-Zhuang and San-Chung should complete on time, there should not have exaggerations on stressing the point of construction re-planning, and mis-leading the general public.
? MRT spoken man Zhung, Chi-De said, according to the negociation of Lo-Sheng’ land use, the entire plan had delay 18 months. Youth Union quoted report of Prof. Liu, Ke-Chung (Taiwan University), regardless the re-plan, MRT itself already delayed more than 12 months.

Lo-Sheng Youth Union addressed, Taipei City is the role of the capital city of Taiwan, it should have responsibility of problem solving, should not indulge the corruption of technical officers, who use convenient as priority and make-up a plan that damaged culture, eco-system and humanism.


3. Lo-Sheng temporally regarded as historical site, MRT try to turnover the decision. Reported by Chen, Cun-Xiong.

Cultural council’s new decision to keep Lo-Sheng as temporally historical site caused serious delay of Xing-Zhuang MRT. MRT point out, 18 months of delay time effects millions of Xing-Zhuang and San-Chunag’s residents, and lose 1 billions each year. MRT said, the overall progression of Xing-Zhuang MRT is 51%, 1% ahead, but the land use right delay from 2004.07.15, current evaluation would be 18 month delay. According to The Exective Yan’s document, Xing-Zhuang MRT should function before year 2010, and now regard as Mission Impossible by MRT.
.
Xing-Zhuang MRT is trying to use NO.32 [Wen-Zhi Policy] to turnover the decision, according to [Historical Site would be dis-concern due to importance of national developing and security reason], the propose should submit to core organization to run, and Cultural Council is also the core organization.

During 6 months of temporally historical site inspection, a professional group formed by Taipei County and Tao Yuan County, a decision will made to Lo-Sheng.


4. MRT : Construction delayed 2 years. Reported by Shi, Chung-Yao

Lo-Sheng regard as temporary historical site effects 2 years delay time of Xing-Zhuang MRT, rental of transitional station, repairing fees would caused for more than 350 millions, said MRT spoken man Zhung, Chi-De. Zhung added, most Lo-Sheng’s patients moved to new building, but 50 people refused and effected MRT’s Xing-Zhuang and Lo-Zhung line. The main construction of Xing-Zhuang line is ahead of planning, however, the land use of transitional station is Lo-Sheng’s old
colony can not be deconstructed, which caused delay of 18 months, and now re-evaluation would caused another 6 months. The transitional station would delay more than 24 months. Zhung said, central government allowed the use of Lo-Sheng colony as Xing-Zhuang MRT’s transitional station at year 1993, and now delay the first section of Xing-Zhuang line at year 2009.


5. Governmenters : compensation had common sense, historical site are negotiated. Reported by Fan Jiang, Tai-De & Gao, Yu-Zhi.

Lo-Sheng Self-Help Union and several governmenters addressed, government should make solution for their violence of long-year isolating policy of Lo-Sheng’s patients and make decision for the historical building for the sake of justice.
[Democratic Progressive Party : DPP] hold 2 sides of opinions and negotiation, ideally, DPP decided to ask compensation for patients and open to the question of historical site. Wu, Bin-Shu & Chao, Lai-Wan [DPP] said, Lo-Sheng is decided as 3rd grade historical site by Cultural council temporally, however, according to [Wen-Zhi Policy], Taipei County shall make final decision within 6 months. For the right and developing of Taipei County’s residents, they would protest to against to the end. Crowded protest would be possible to speak their voice to Taipei County. For the eco and culture question, Wu said, those questions should rise long earlier before, now MRT has been planned so long, plan should not be changed to effect rights of Taipei County’s resident. He insisted there should have no delay to Xing-Zhuang MRT.

Lin, Shu-Fan & officer of education and culture – Guan, Bi-Lin have different opinions, they insisted the historical site should be decided. Guan, Bi-Lin said, the discussion of Lo-Sheng’s historical site has passed out the golden time, either keep or not keep the building, it would be both difficult, there have pity remind already, she thinks, Lo-Sheng is very important cultural heritage to mark for Taiwan Medical History. Guo Jin, Su-Mei [none party], Di, Shou-Chung [KMT] & Yi, Lin-Ying [TSU] with several Han-Sheng patients hold conference yesterday, according to [228 compensation policy], blueprint of of [Han-Sheng Policy of Taiwan] is drafted.

Lo-Sheng Self-Help Union addressed, Japan local court judged Japanese Government offend humanistic right by earlier leprosy isolation policy. Parliament passed compensation policy efficiently. To the mirror side of Taiwan’s situation, isolation policy was still in used after Japanese colonial period. In 1994, our government gave Lo-Sheng to MRT. In 2002, old patient forced to move out of the house where they have been living for more than 40, or 50 years.

For hundreds of Lo-Sheng’s patient and 3000 leprosy patients on list, Lo-Sheng Self-Help Union said government shall apologise and de-maligning to leprosy patients, according to individual cases and compensate amount of 6 millions the maximal to each, special case be given 8 millions. The draft also point out the core organization shall soon decided Lo-Sheng Colony as National Historical Heritage, protect its cultural and eco value.

Most of all agreed with the principle of compensation and keeping property, but some governmenter has different opinion on the amount of compensation, Guo Jin, Su-Mei [none party] thought most patients have been accept some medical compensation, the amount of draft is too much. Di, Shou-Chung [KMT] thought the amount of compensation or realm of site keeping could be discussed under the principle of taking care of Lo-Sheng’s patients.



新文資法 文建會扛得吃力【2005/12/31 聯合報】
【記者周美惠/專題報導】
今年1月,立法院三讀通過新版「文化資產保存法」,歷任文建會主委陳其南、陳郁秀、申學庸、陳奇祿等開香檳慶祝歷經20多年來的努力,文建會總算達成「文化事權統一」心願。
舊版文資法自民國71年5月公布實施,以往文化事務分散在內政部、教育部、交通部、經濟部、文建會、農委會等,新版文資法除將自然地景維持由農委會管,其餘歸文建會,為文建會改制文化部鋪路。
當過去歸內政部管轄的古蹟業務改歸文建會後,更大的考驗才剛開始。新法賦予文建會逕列暫定古蹟的「尚方寶劍」:當地方主管機關應作為而未執行古蹟保存工作時,中央主管機關得依法代行處理。因台北捷運面臨存廢爭議的新莊樂生療養院,在新版文資法通過後,第一個要求文建會依法將樂生列為暫定古蹟,原本歸地方政府管轄的古蹟指定工作,因地方政府遲不作為,其壓力立即轉嫁到文建會身上。
耐人尋味的是,樂生療養院保存案原本並不被古蹟保存學界看好,但爭取保存樂生的文化學界人士在與人權、環保等社運團體合流後,匯整為強勢遊說力量。以大學生及研究生為主體的青年樂生聯盟等團體,近一兩年來分別就人權、法律、環保、古蹟保存等議題發揮,硬是將樂生院民的人權議題推向全國甚至是國際議壇,不但在東京打贏官司、要求日本政府賠償痲瘋病友,更讓原本弱勢的痲瘋病友,意外成為強力阻撓捷運興建的主角。
文建會在青年樂生聯盟等抗爭下,終於在縣市長選舉後正式將樂生暫定古蹟。不過,暫定古蹟只能讓樂生維持現狀6個月到1年,指定古蹟的職權仍得回到已然換黨執政的台北縣政府手中。新科台北縣長周錫瑋在地方民代要求1個月內解決樂生問題的壓力下,決定「請示文建會」。
眼下的難題是,若台北縣執意不指定樂生為古蹟,文建會是否依法逕行代審?此例一開,是否各地方政府遇有古蹟爭議,統統找上文建會,以致文建會為指定古蹟疲於奔命,並與地方政府爭端不斷?


捷運新蘆線潛盾機 撞上自家基樁

記者馮復華/台北報導 【2006/01/05 聯合報】

「300公噸的潛盾機一頭撞上地下30公尺基樁,進退不得6個月?」台北市議員田欣等人,昨天質疑捷運新莊蘆洲線出現重大工程烏龍。
他們說,去年10月間潛盾機開挖大橋國小站隧道時,被不明障礙卡住無法前進,查明後,原來是撞上自家打設的基樁。
議員質疑同樣一段捷運工程,兩包商每個月都開會,居然潛盾機還會撞上基樁,現在潛盾機貿然撤退,還可能會造成地層下陷,影響周邊地層,連帶影響大橋國小站附近百戶民宅生命安全;潛盾機從去年10月卡到今年4月才可能「拔除」,將延誤6個月工期。
台北市捷運局南工處長張武訓昨天表示,潛盾機挖到基樁,是兩承包商整合協調的疏失,已更改工法改善,不會增加工程預算,也不會影響新蘆線通車時程。
市議員田欣、徐佳青、李建昌、周威佑昨天舉行記者會指出,新蘆線因為捷運局人為監工疏失,導致重達300公噸的潛盾機卡在地底,質疑這是北市捷運工程史上最大烏龍。
田欣表示,這種工程意外實在很離譜,因為負責打樁工程和潛盾工程的兩家包商,都是按照捷運局所核定的施工圖施工,且相關單位每個月都要召開一次界面協調,捷運局相關單位及設計顧問,也都要派員參加,由此可見,這些橫向連繫根本沒有發揮任何功用。
李建昌指出,新蘆線分屬捷運機工處、北工處、南工處及中工處四個單位管轄,大橋國小站剛好是北工處和南工處交界處,潛盾機會撞到基樁,凸顯捷運局各單位本位主義及各自為政的現象。
張武訓則說,這宗意外確實是廠商間介面協調不足所致,基樁已經埋設兩年,當初埋設時因淡水河沿岸地質差,比捷運局所規範的更深,跟最初設計圖有差異,且基樁包商協調時,疏忽未將更動過的施工圖交給潛盾機包商,才造成此意外。
張武訓說,至今仍埋在地底的潛盾機,已派員先整體改良地盤,新工具本月底將來台,三個月內將基樁套住、重新灌漿,穩固後,再拔除潛盾機,可鞏固地層不致發生坍塌,所有索賠由包商自行協調支付,捷運局不會負擔。
 
last sunday, 26 of Feb, for a long while havn't visit grandma and grandmom, they seems much the same as one month ago, open-mind, easy-going, talk alot about nature and thier new-year experience, some of them be together with families, and a sense of not fitting in, the sound workshop went fine, i play them 5 tracks of soundscpae, some close eye and listen carefully, some fall asleep, >"< after each listening, we discussed thier intiuition, flashback or imagination, more the less, reflection to thier sufferring or lack of optimised thoughts occurred within childish respond, and slowly move to some happier experiences as we might have, swimming in the river of unvisible dangers, hearing bad recording as passing train, noticed specific events from tv, etc, etc, its amazing to see how they draw the conversation forward to next track i was going to play, and chatted like old friend in the late evening, was slimy raining that day..

recording played

1.bird - recorded @ sothern island of JP

2.ocean - recorded @ taidong coast,tw

3.river - recorded @ southern island of JP

4.beecracks - recorded @ tainan lantern festival, tw

5.grass - recorded @ taipei, tw
 
Nice site!
[url=http://adpagkrp.com/nkke/rawu.html]My homepage[/url] | [url=http://yfvjincp.com/hzgf/yzyf.html]Cool site[/url]
 
Great work!
My homepage | Please visit
 
Nice site!
http://adpagkrp.com/nkke/rawu.html | http://gqrmplvm.com/jtmd/kzep.html
 
Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link



<< Home
ARCHIVES
June 2003 / July 2003 / August 2003 / September 2003 / October 2003 / June 2004 / July 2004 / September 2004 / December 2004 / January 2005 / February 2005 / May 2005 / September 2005 / October 2005 / December 2005 / January 2006 / February 2006 / March 2006 / April 2006 / May 2006 / September 2006 / October 2006 / November 2006 / February 2007 / June 2007 / July 2007 / September 2007 / October 2007 / November 2007 / January 2008 / March 2008 / May 2008 / August 2008 / September 2008 / November 2008 / December 2008 / June 2009 / July 2009 / August 2009 / September 2009 / October 2009 / April 2010 / September 2010 / October 2010 / November 2010 / December 2010 / March 2011 / June 2011 / December 2011 /

台灣環境資訊中心
Eco Garden
World Soundscape Project
樂生文學周末
地景保育
dimension plus
吃線的人
ilyagram
pink tentacle
FLOSS Manual
Digital Artists Handbook
IMA.AT
optofonica
sound field and sound-image related... among of those recreations, or projects, please detour to www.little-object.com